This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 16, 2021. It is now read-only.
Single support #77
Closed
Single support #77
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Because that solution is not acceptable (we have talked about that internally already) I will close that for now... |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This will fix #40
Because in Java it is not possible to have the same Signature but a different return value I've splittet the RxTiPresenterUtils into three parts:
RxTiObservableUtilsRxTiUtilsRxTiSingleUtilsRxTiPresenterUtilsis deprecated now.I've removed the
Presenterin the class name because you can use it in Activtiys as well..It is really not recommended but not mandatory...
However. I've also changed these "pattern" in Rx2.
But at this time, because we have no
deliver*Viewmethods, only theRxTiUtilsclass exist.We need in Rx2 also a
RxTiMaybeUtils:)But that will be done in the future...
I've also added a simple example in our sample.