Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Comparison with Llama3 #6

Open
elmoBG8 opened this issue Apr 26, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Comparison with Llama3 #6

elmoBG8 opened this issue Apr 26, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@elmoBG8
Copy link

elmoBG8 commented Apr 26, 2024

I see you compared your version with other models, but what about the version from which you derived it?
Thanks

@xhluca
Copy link
Contributor

xhluca commented Apr 26, 2024

In the weblinx paper, we have found that non-finetuned models are not as good as finetuned models, so it is unlikely that Llama-3-8b-Instruct surpasses Llama-3-8B-Web. However, if you think it's worth adding the results, it should be fairly straightforward to run the eval script with minor changes to the config: https://github.com/McGill-NLP/webllama/tree/main/modeling#run-llama-on-evaluation-splits

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants