Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ngamahu, Flame's Advance transforms Timeless Jewels damage type node to fire damage #7610

Open
3 tasks done
NL908 opened this issue May 2, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #7611
Open
3 tasks done

Ngamahu, Flame's Advance transforms Timeless Jewels damage type node to fire damage #7610

NL908 opened this issue May 2, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #7611
Labels
bug:calculation Numerical differences

Comments

@NL908
Copy link

NL908 commented May 2, 2024

Check version

  • I'm running the latest version of Path of Building and I've verified this by checking the changelog

Check for duplicates

  • I've checked for duplicate open and closed issues by using the search function of the issue tracker

Check for support

  • I've checked that the calculation is supposed to be supported. If it isn't please open a feature request instead (Red text is a feature request).

What is the value from the calculation in-game?

This timeless jewel node should still apply physical damage increases
image
image
image

What is the value from the calculation in Path of Building?

The physical damage increases is transformed into fire damage increase via Ngamahu, Flame's Advance
image

How to reproduce the issue

This bugged calculation can be reproduced by using other Timeless Jewels, such as Glorious Vanity with #% increased cold damage with seed 122 at the same notable.

Character build code

https://pobb.in/AmreZvd90Div

Screenshots

No response

@NL908 NL908 added the bug:calculation Numerical differences label May 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug:calculation Numerical differences
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant