You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I don't know how much of this would be opinionated, or if it is a standard. For example, this could better support Zotero, but make it worse for Mendeley (personally I don't use any for citations). Also many conferences vary in citation styles.
I stumbled on this issue when upgrading from v0.9 to v0.10.x.
In v0.9, date was working flawlessly for me.
Due to the new group_by behavior, the date field is no longer working. al-folio now expects a year field.
My Solution was to tell Zotero to use the Better Bibtex instead of the Better BibLaTex format. The former one uses year.
There are some differences from the field exported by Zotero (at least the BetterBibTex plugin) and the ones al-folio expects:
journaltitle
andshortjournal
, while al-folio expectsjournal
date
(ISO 8601 format, e.g. "2023-07-01"), while al-folio expects ayear
url
, while al-folio expectspdf
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: