Confusion around gin #393
David-Orson
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I was recommended this package and passed the recommendation to my current boss for my company to look into using. However when we quickly glanced we came to the conclusion that gin was required for this package.
Granted, we should have been less hasty with our conclusion, but it does seem to be somewhat ambiguous.
I would recommend adding a comment that ensures future readers know that this package is not restricted to gin.
Thanks :)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions