Simpler deployment?

[prologic]

Hi all 👋

I just followed the installation instructions to try out and test Harbor on my Mac using Docker Desktop for macOS.

Here is the result:

(⎈ |local:default)
prologic@Jamess-iMac
Sat Sep 11 11:47:01
~/Downloads/harbor
 0
$ wc -l docker-compose.yml ; docker images ; docker system df
264 docker-compose.yml
REPOSITORY                    TAG       IMAGE ID       CREATED       SIZE
goharbor/redis-photon         v2.3.2    812c6f5c260b   3 weeks ago   155MB
goharbor/harbor-registryctl   v2.3.2    0e551984a22c   3 weeks ago   133MB
goharbor/registry-photon      v2.3.2    193d952b4f10   3 weeks ago   81.9MB
goharbor/nginx-photon         v2.3.2    83bd32904c30   3 weeks ago   45MB
goharbor/harbor-log           v2.3.2    dae52c0f300e   3 weeks ago   159MB
goharbor/harbor-jobservice    v2.3.2    5841788c17a4   3 weeks ago   211MB
goharbor/harbor-core          v2.3.2    cf6ad69c2dd4   3 weeks ago   193MB
goharbor/harbor-portal        v2.3.2    4f68bc2f0a41   3 weeks ago   58.2MB
goharbor/harbor-db            v2.3.2    3cc534e09148   3 weeks ago   227MB
goharbor/prepare              v2.3.2    c2bd99a13157   3 weeks ago   252MB
TYPE            TOTAL     ACTIVE    SIZE      RECLAIMABLE
Images          10        10        1.186GB   36.55MB (3%)
Containers      10        9         6.281MB   0B (0%)
Local Volumes   10        10        84B       0B (0%)
Build Cache     0         0         0B        0B

As far as I can tell, everything is up and running and appears to be working:

$ docker ps
CONTAINER ID   IMAGE                                COMMAND                  CREATED          STATUS                    PORTS                                   NAMES
b343fc820be0   goharbor/nginx-photon:v2.3.2         "nginx -g 'daemon of…"   10 minutes ago   Up 10 minutes (healthy)   0.0.0.0:80->8080/tcp, :::80->8080/tcp   nginx
53bfaa2b2d84   goharbor/harbor-jobservice:v2.3.2    "/harbor/entrypoint.…"   10 minutes ago   Up 10 minutes (healthy)                                           harbor-jobservice
5cee6a7dbfb8   goharbor/harbor-core:v2.3.2          "/harbor/entrypoint.…"   10 minutes ago   Up 10 minutes (healthy)                                           harbor-core
c110885f2ced   goharbor/harbor-db:v2.3.2            "/docker-entrypoint.…"   10 minutes ago   Up 10 minutes (healthy)                                           harbor-db
4a467ee9164d   goharbor/harbor-registryctl:v2.3.2   "/home/harbor/start.…"   10 minutes ago   Up 10 minutes (healthy)                                           registryctl
8ffaf8ce5f88   goharbor/registry-photon:v2.3.2      "/home/harbor/entryp…"   10 minutes ago   Up 10 minutes (healthy)                                           registry
16ba94453d18   goharbor/redis-photon:v2.3.2         "redis-server /etc/r…"   10 minutes ago   Up 10 minutes (healthy)                                           redis
0aea4e9f69a1   goharbor/harbor-portal:v2.3.2        "nginx -g 'daemon of…"   10 minutes ago   Up 10 minutes (healthy)                                           harbor-portal
a958266299c8   goharbor/harbor-log:v2.3.2           "/bin/sh -c /usr/loc…"   10 minutes ago   Up 10 minutes (healthy)   127.0.0.1:1514->10514/tcp               harbor-log

But here's the thing, this setup is kind of overkill for my needs. Is there a known simpler docker-compose.yml that I can deploy to a Swarm cluster:

• Without an nginx proxy? I already have an ingress.
• Without a syslog facility, I don't care for this.
• Without postgres as the database, can we use sqlite?

Also why do we need redis as well?

Thanks!

[wy65701436]

Without an nginx proxy? I already have an ingress.
TheoreticalIy, it's possible. But you have to figure out the configuration on harbor-core & your ingress.

Without a syslog facility, I don't care for this.
You can use the external log setting. https://github.com/goharbor/harbor/blob/master/make/harbor.yml.tmpl#L122

Without postgres as the database, can we use sqlite?
Currently, we do only support postgres. If you'd like to support sqlite, please file requirment, like: #6534

[prologic]

This is disappointing that a reimplementation of Docker Hub has to be so complex 😥