Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create Excellent Local LLM Multi-Agent Implementation #435

Open
1 task done
hinthornw opened this issue May 12, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
1 task done

Create Excellent Local LLM Multi-Agent Implementation #435

hinthornw opened this issue May 12, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@hinthornw
Copy link
Contributor

hinthornw commented May 12, 2024

Privileged issue

  • I am a LangChain maintainer, or was asked directly by a LangChain maintainer to create an issue here.

Issue Content

Context: Open (meaning weights-available here) models have come a long way! When it comes to reliable tool use over multiple turns, they still require more programming (via better instructions, few-shots, etc.) than most of the leading-edge models (gpt-4*, Opus, Gemini even). Because of this, the maintainers of this repo haven't yet taken the time to develop an excellent, reliable reference implementation using Llama 3, Mixtral, or another "open" model that anyone can use and it "just works".

People are especially interested in the Multi-agent supervisor pattern and in customer support-type use-cases where some agentic loop is incorporated.

We'd love to make better examples of common design patterns and add evals to demonstrate where they work more broadly to make it easier for folks to build more advanced applications without having to use closed APIs.

These examples must be of high quality. If no one gets to it, I'll try to implement myself, but I haven't currently allocated cycles for this.

@hinthornw hinthornw added the enhancement New feature or request label May 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant