Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

It's very good! But... #191

Closed
GrantLau1226 opened this issue May 17, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

It's very good! But... #191

GrantLau1226 opened this issue May 17, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
@wangzhaode
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@GrantLau1226
Copy link

微信图片_20240517104346
@GrantLau1226 GrantLau1226 changed the title Very good! But... It's very good! But... May 17, 2024
@wangzhaode wangzhaode self-assigned this May 17, 2024
@wangzhaode wangzhaode added the question Further information is requested label May 17, 2024
@wangzhaode
Copy link
Owner

O_o ~

@wangzhaode
Copy link
Owner

We will support more quantization algorithms in the future to improve accuracy.

@GrantLau1226
Copy link
Author

GrantLau1226 commented May 17, 2024 •
edited

That's okay, it's not uncommon in LLM, and making the model more accurate is a common goal.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@wangzhaode wangzhaode

Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@wangzhaode @GrantLau1226