Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Annotation on accumulation #225

Open
ClementLeBihan opened this issue Mar 25, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Annotation on accumulation #225

ClementLeBihan opened this issue Mar 25, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@ClementLeBihan
Copy link

Hi all,

I'm creating this ticket to discuss about an accumulation feature to help annotate LiDAR data.

To accumulate data, we need to know the lidar pose in a global frame. I think we could use the lidar_config to register the lidar pose.

We could then load multiple pointclouds in their corresponding frame, and directly annotate multi-frames.

What do you think about this feature ?

@jotamotk
Copy link
Collaborator

This is an absolutely innovative feature. We are still developing it for our cloud version, and it will be coming soon.

@ClementLeBihan
Copy link
Author

ClementLeBihan commented Mar 26, 2024

I did a first try with a setting Add Accumulation that load additional frames'pc and append it in the existing pc ...

Screenshot from 2024-03-26 09-28-37

To do so, I load the lidar_config pose matrix in IFrame lidarExternalPose of each additional frames, and I transform the pointcloud of additional frames in the current frame ... I saw there is a worldMatrix in IFrame object, it may be better to use it, I do not know exactlly what is the better way.
Maybe using the worldMatrix of objects can be easier to display multiple frames ...
What do you think ?

@guhaomine
Copy link
Collaborator

You are right, using worldMatrix can easily operate each point cloud. But integrating such functions into tools is not easy, and we are also trying to complete it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants