website/docs: remove marketing from skyhigh

[jsiegel-supplyframe]

Details

removing advertising copy from documentation

---

Checklist

• Local tests pass (ak test authentik/)
• The code has been formatted (make lint-fix)

If an API change has been made

• The API schema has been updated (make gen-build)

If changes to the frontend have been made

• The code has been formatted (make web)

If applicable

• [ X] The documentation has been updated
• The documentation has been formatted (make website)

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for authentik-storybook canceled.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	e642738
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/authentik-storybook/deploys/664bd472daa00200084d213f

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for authentik-docs ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	e642738
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/authentik-docs/deploys/664bd472bd01f20008df6956
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-9666--authentik-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 50.96%. Comparing base (8b74b83) to head (e642738).
Report is 50 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #9666       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   92.39%   50.96%   -41.43%     
===========================================
  Files         704      706        +2     
  Lines       34396    34356       -40     
===========================================
- Hits        31781    17511    -14270     
- Misses       2615    16845    +14230     

Flag	Coverage Δ
e2e	49.58% <ø> (-0.08%)	⬇️
integration	25.34% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
unit	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[tanberry]

Thanks @jsiegel-supplyframe, I agree about removing that section. The original contributor can rewrite it in a more straightforward, technical way if desired.

Can you run lint-prettier and push again, please? The build is failing on that check. You can safely ignore the other four fails.