Fix variable name in Linux build instructions

[Jayman2000]

Pull Request Type

• GitHub Workflow changes
• Documentation or Wiki changes
• Build and Dependency changes
• Runtime changes
  • Render changes
  • Audio changes
  • Input changes
  • Network changes
  • Other changes

Description

0b41a1b (CMake: expose BUILD_TESTNG option, rename LOGGER to ENABLE_LOGGER, 2024-04-29) had originally introduced this change. It looks like d132a1c (Merge pull request #251 from winterheart/pstring-unittests, 2024-05-01) unintentionally removed this change.

Related Issues

Checklist

• I have tested my changes locally and verified that they work as intended.
• I have documented any new or modified functionality.
• I have reviewed the changes to ensure they do not introduce any unnecessary complexity or duplicate code.
• I understand that by submitting this pull request, I am agreeing to license my contributions under the project's license.

Additional Comments

[Lgt2x]

while you're at it could you also replace the wrong package spdlog-dev by libspdlog-dev in the Ubuntu install instructions? Thanks!

[Jayman2000]

while you're at it could you also replace the wrong package spdlog-dev by libspdlog-dev in the Ubuntu install instructions? Thanks!

I actually already made that change in #259.

[JeodC]

Why would you not merge your two PRs into one if they affect the same file? This will prevent conflicts when one is merged.

[Jayman2000]

Why would you not merge your two PRs into one if they affect the same file? This will prevent conflicts when one is merged.

I finished the other PR before I figured out what to do about this issue. The other PR’s branch’s name is build-instructions-dependency-corrections. In order to update that PR, I would have to rename the branch because this fix isn’t dependency-related. Unfortunately, you can’t change a PR branch’s name. Instead, you have to close the old pull request and open a new one. I didn't want to close that pull request, so I decided to open a new one with just this change.

Do you want me to create a new pull request that is a combination of both this PR and #259?

[JeodC]

Nah the explanation is fine. Thanks.