-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 722
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
WIP: Migrate to IntelliJ Platform Gradle Plugin 2.0 #879
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
WIP: Migrate to IntelliJ Platform Gradle Plugin 2.0 #879
Conversation
// TODO: Robot server task not yet available | ||
// downloadRobotServerPlugin { | ||
// version.set(remoteRobotVersion) | ||
// } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's supposed to happen with this task?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The downloadRobotServerPlugin
is removed. The Robot Server Plugin will be added through the dependencies {}
block.
ATM, the testIdeUI
and testIdePerformance
tasks are not available yet, but they will be there soon!
// systemProperty("jb.consents.confirmation.enabled", "false") | ||
// systemProperty("ide.show.tips.on.startup.default.value", "false") | ||
// systemProperty("octopus.handler", System.getProperty("octopus.handler") ?: true) | ||
// } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also this task? I don't know how the current UI tests work...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
WIP, tasks will be available soon.
// TODO: Do we need this to be here *and* in plugin.xml? | ||
sinceBuild.set("233.11799.67") | ||
untilBuild.set(provider { null }) | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we set since-build
here, will the Plugin DevKit use it for analysis? We have it duplicated in plugin.xml
right now, it would be nice to only set in one place
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You can set it in Gradle build file only. Those values are used by the patchPluginXml
file to update the plugin.xml
file. All further checks performed by the Gradle plugin respect those values.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What about the DevKit though? Does it look at the patched or unpatched plugin.xml?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
After some tests, it seems that DevKit only uses the value in the unpatched plugin.xml
, so it's still worth keeping both values, even though it would make things easier to specify only in the build scripts
instrumentationTools() | ||
|
||
testFramework(TestFrameworkType.Platform.JUnit4) | ||
testFramework(TestFrameworkType.Platform.JUnit5) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems unexpected to require two frameworks, but it fails with only one, and runs with two, so...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fails how?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Either unresolved items (the @RunInEdt
annotation) or runtime failures, also about the wrong threading models. Is it expected to require two frameworks?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's unexpected. I'll take a look.
f274fff
to
5356fed
Compare
5356fed
to
2ec7a33
Compare
As a not, we HAVE to use 2.0 to target 242: https://plugins.jetbrains.com/docs/intellij/tools-gradle-intellij-plugin.html#usage |
205a7c6
to
b272bbf
Compare
b272bbf
to
e8150ee
Compare
This PR migrates to the new IntelliJ Platform Gradle Plugin 2.0 (beta2). This is necessary to target 242, but more importantly, allows us to use "split mode" to reproduce and debug remote development issues. It's also easier to configure, and makes it easy to run the plugin in a different IDE, even locally built or installed IDEs.
It is still a work in progress, and not yet ready to merge. I will be actively updating and force-pushing changes into this branch.
The following build features work as expected:
AceJump
(optional) dependency:test
,vim-engine:test
, andjava-tests:test
long-running-tests
andproperty-tests
(there are failures, but these matchmaster
)runPluginVerifier
toverifyPlugin
, so the "IdeaVim full verification" run configuration has been updatedsince-build
value is specified in bothbuild.gradle.kts
andplugin.xml
. It would be better to specify it just once, and have the DevKit and the plugin verifier automatically pick this up from a single sourceOther changes:
settings.gradle
has been migrated tosettings.gradle.kts
.intellijPlatform/
(Ivy XML files to reference bundled plugins, etc.) This folder is added to.gitignore
runIdeSplitMode
task and equivalent "Start IJ with IdeaVim (Split Mode)" run configuration have been added, to run the IDE in split mode, with the plugin loaded in the frontend, as per remote dev/CWM.createOpenApiSourcesJar
has been renamedsourcesJar
to match the default task created withjava.withSourcesJar()
. This also means the final file is renamedIdeaVIM-{version}-sources.jar
instead of having the-src.jar
suffix. This needs verifying for any external CI processes that need to call the task, or rely on the name of the fileThere are also the following IdeaVim issues, which aren't required for this PR, but should be noted and fixed at some point:
annotation-processors.jar
, which is not required at run timecodeql-cli-2.17.4
, but this doesn't appear to be used/released yet.