Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

use statically known instead of suppress guard for ddp stride propagation #126234

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

eellison
Copy link
Contributor

@eellison eellison commented May 14, 2024

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented May 14, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/126234

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit ac83252 with merge base 9df2f86 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

eellison added a commit that referenced this pull request May 14, 2024
…tion

ghstack-source-id: 0e788ef3bd789ca6d9d8e58cc2194c914058ff1f
Pull Request resolved: #126234
@eellison eellison requested a review from ezyang May 14, 2024 23:04
Copy link
Contributor

@ezyang ezyang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks. Do you know if the as_strided generates guards?

@eellison
Copy link
Contributor Author

It does not.

@eellison eellison added the topic: not user facing topic category label May 14, 2024
@eellison
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label May 14, 2024
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2024
Oops, in #125610 I moved this function to runtime_wrappers.py, but forgot to delete the old one. #126234 then modified it which would do nothing, so I'm applying the change correctly now and deleting the function as I intended.

Pull Request resolved: #126407
Approved by: https://github.com/eellison
ZelboK pushed a commit to ZelboK/pytorch that referenced this pull request May 19, 2024
ZelboK pushed a commit to ZelboK/pytorch that referenced this pull request May 19, 2024
Oops, in pytorch#125610 I moved this function to runtime_wrappers.py, but forgot to delete the old one. pytorch#126234 then modified it which would do nothing, so I'm applying the change correctly now and deleting the function as I intended.

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#126407
Approved by: https://github.com/eellison
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ciflow/inductor ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged topic: not user facing topic category
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants