[3.10] Always record original default values

[radcortez]

No description provided.

[gsmet]

@radcortez so the problem wasn't that it didn't apply cleanly, the problem is I had a test failure:

See this comment: #40634 (comment)

[radcortez]

Ah, never mind. I misunderstood. I thought you meant you had a conflict in the code. Let me have a look.

[radcortez]

The SR Config update to 3.8 does not require this fix, but since Quarkus 3.10 is still on SR Config 3.7, we also need to fix it for mappings defaults.

[quarkus-bot]

Status for workflow Quarkus CI

This is the status report for running Quarkus CI on commit 0b17dd6.

✅ The latest workflow run for the pull request has completed successfully.

It should be safe to merge provided you have a look at the other checks in the summary.

You can consult the Develocity build scans.

---

Flaky tests - Develocity

⚙️ JVM Tests - JDK 21

📦 extensions/websockets-next/server/deployment

✖ io.quarkus.websockets.next.test.openconnections.OpenConnectionsTest.testOpenConnections - History

• Condition with Lambda expression in io.quarkus.websockets.next.test.utils.WSClient was not fulfilled within 10 seconds. - org.awaitility.core.ConditionTimeoutException

org.awaitility.core.ConditionTimeoutException: Condition with Lambda expression in io.quarkus.websockets.next.test.utils.WSClient was not fulfilled within 10 seconds.
	at org.awaitility.core.ConditionAwaiter.await(ConditionAwaiter.java:167)
	at org.awaitility.core.CallableCondition.await(CallableCondition.java:78)
	at org.awaitility.core.CallableCondition.await(CallableCondition.java:26)
	at org.awaitility.core.ConditionFactory.until(ConditionFactory.java:1006)
	at org.awaitility.core.ConditionFactory.until(ConditionFactory.java:975)
	at io.quarkus.websockets.next.test.utils.WSClient.waitForMessages(WSClient.java:102)
	at io.quarkus.websockets.next.test.openconnections.OpenConnectionsTest.testOpenConnections(OpenConnectionsTest.java:69)